Miralls del Dema
Designed the engraving on the mic
Created and uploaded the instagram posts
iterated for the installation to be more accessible and understandable
Participating in LLUM'25 alongside Cristian, Pablo and my colleagues, constituted an intellectually stimulating and professionally enriching experience. This project, one of the most substantial in my portfolio, provided an unparalleled opportunity to observe firsthand the nuanced dynamics of user interaction within public spaces. Witnessing the public's engagement with the completed installation illuminated critical insights into individual behavioral patterns, collective responses, and the complexities inherent in collaborative creative processes.
The conceptualization and realization of Miralls del Demà, a collaborative AI visualizer, necessitated a multidisciplinary approach that transcended traditional aesthetic considerations. My primary responsibilities were the design of the installation's physical aesthetics, the microphone stand and the engravings, creative material for communication, and the strategic curation of its digital presence via Instagram. This dual focus facilitated an exploration of the symbiotic relationship between tangible spatial design and digital narrative construction. Observing participants' physical navigation around the installation and their affective reactions to the interplay of reflective surfaces and algorithmically generated visuals provided empirical data on the affective and cognitive dimensions of design in situ.
The collaborative framework was instrumental in translating abstract theoretical constructs into a coherent, experiential reality. Our iterative design process, marked by rigorous critique and adaptive problem-solving, underscored the epistemological value of dialogue and interdisciplinary synthesis. Each phase of development presented unique challenges—ranging from material constraints to the modulation of light dynamics—each of which served as a catalyst for deeper inquiry into the phenomenology of space and form.
Crucially, the installation functioned as a dynamic feedback mechanism, wherein public interaction acted as both a performative element and an evaluative metric. The spectrum of audience responses—from inquisitive engagement to moments of disorientation—revealed the inherent unpredictability of user experiences and highlighted the necessity for design resilience and adaptability.
In retrospect, LLUM'25 transcended its role as a mere exhibition; it operated as a living laboratory, advancing my understanding of interactive installations and the ontological intersections of art, technology, and public discourse. The knowledge acquired through this project will undoubtedly inform and refine my future scholarly and professional endeavors.